The book of Job, the socratic method, Congress, parliamentarianism, and monitored group discussions all have in common an organized conversation that builds wisdom and abstraction. Fools have no use for these things and cannot develop them well.
A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.
Maybe we don't see as many "progressives" doing podcasts because they are more interested in telling people the good news that Jesus saved them from their sin and the joy He provides in that, not wasting their time arguing about how to improve the modern mishnah.
“One interesting thing to note: To date, the more progressive wing of the PCA has not been successful at establishing a similar array of podcasts. It’s hard to say why this is the case. “
This is very good to read, but it’s similar to talk radio. Liberals haven’t been anywhere as successful as conservatives with programming such as Rush was, and Dan Bongaino (sp?) is now. Whatever the reason, though, it is a good thing.
The book of Job, the socratic method, Congress, parliamentarianism, and monitored group discussions all have in common an organized conversation that builds wisdom and abstraction. Fools have no use for these things and cannot develop them well.
A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.
Proverbs 18:2
Maybe we don't see as many "progressives" doing podcasts because they are more interested in telling people the good news that Jesus saved them from their sin and the joy He provides in that, not wasting their time arguing about how to improve the modern mishnah.
“One interesting thing to note: To date, the more progressive wing of the PCA has not been successful at establishing a similar array of podcasts. It’s hard to say why this is the case. “
This is very good to read, but it’s similar to talk radio. Liberals haven’t been anywhere as successful as conservatives with programming such as Rush was, and Dan Bongaino (sp?) is now. Whatever the reason, though, it is a good thing.