Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Diane's avatar

Dozens of recipe sites show that Scottish shortbread, Dutch butter cookies and American sugar cookies are virtually the same recipe. The recipes for unleavened bread on all these sites are variations of flour, oil, and salt. American Presbyterians seem to be the only people in the world who think shortbread is unleavened bread. Even Wikipedia and Google searches note the difference. If, as you say, you are NOT attempting to replicate unleavened bread as defined in Scripture, then why call it that? It is misleading. The tradition of using shortbread started in 2 outposts in Scotland in the late 18th century and was then banned in the early 20th century. I wonder why it was banned -- maybe something to do with Article 35 of the Belgic Confession?

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

Actually, this is not unleavened bread. Scripture defines it as grain (flour), oil and salt. No sweetening agents were allowed at all, possibly because of fermentation, but also it was a pagan practice to offer sweet cakes to goddesses which the Israelites did from the time they were in Egypt to the time of Jeremiah. This recipe not only has a leavening agent in it (baking powder), but it also has sugar and butter. In the late 19th and early 20th century, the Assembly in Scotland banned the use of this shortbread sugar cookie for use in communion in Scotland on the grounds that it was not bread. That did not stop American Evangelicals from using it though. In Scotland, no one would call this unleavened bread. It is marketed as as shortbread, a dessert cookie.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts