Brad, when point 11 says "Christians are commanded to... submit to [these magistrates] unless they command us to do evil," is this intending to say that Christians are commanded to *always* submit to magistrates with the *sole* exception of when they command us to sin? If so, that would contradict the WCF.
23.4 specifies "It is the duty of people... to obey their *lawful* commands, and to be subject to their authority, for *conscience* sake."
19.4 specifies "they who... oppose any *lawful* power, or the *lawful* exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God."
Wouldn't you agree that these necessarily imply that it is *not* the duty of the people to obey a magistrate's unlawful commands, and that any one *may* oppose unlawful civil powers, and unlawful exercise of civil power? (And that, as C. Hodge and many others understood, such unlawfulness is not merely identical to commanding us to sin, but may include their commanding such things as are outside their God-given jurisdiction/authority?)
Maybe it's more of a "reaffirnation" since all read Christians should be able to agree with what you wrote. Mr. Peacock doth err greatly in his comment btw, and Mr. Sims...well, you just don't pay him no mind.
Brad, when point 11 says "Christians are commanded to... submit to [these magistrates] unless they command us to do evil," is this intending to say that Christians are commanded to *always* submit to magistrates with the *sole* exception of when they command us to sin? If so, that would contradict the WCF.
23.4 specifies "It is the duty of people... to obey their *lawful* commands, and to be subject to their authority, for *conscience* sake."
19.4 specifies "they who... oppose any *lawful* power, or the *lawful* exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God."
Wouldn't you agree that these necessarily imply that it is *not* the duty of the people to obey a magistrate's unlawful commands, and that any one *may* oppose unlawful civil powers, and unlawful exercise of civil power? (And that, as C. Hodge and many others understood, such unlawfulness is not merely identical to commanding us to sin, but may include their commanding such things as are outside their God-given jurisdiction/authority?)
Maybe it's more of a "reaffirnation" since all read Christians should be able to agree with what you wrote. Mr. Peacock doth err greatly in his comment btw, and Mr. Sims...well, you just don't pay him no mind.
The Scriptures do not "describe us as pilgrims and strangers in the world." Rather, they describe people who lived 2000 years ago in that way.
So you're a Christian Nationalist after all, eh? Maybe not of the Stephen Wolfe variety, but a CN nonetheless.
Adhere to scripture and don’t worry about what people call it.
Sounds like Christian Nationalism to me.
Is that a bad thing?
Thank you for the reminder and excellent summary.